Why Many Different Credits Would Be Better

In the last few weeks there have been a few Carbon market 'firsts' announced.

 

The first UN Credits traded on NYMEX (RNK and Vitol), the first ECX UN Credit trade (TFS and Eneco), the first RGGI Auction 'announced' (New England states), and even the first CER deliveries to the Swiss Registry (by a bunch of arrogant Dutch fools).

 

What is more interesting about these events, aside from the PR value, is the filling in of the gaps in the curve.

 

Since the EUA has been issued, it has maintained it predominance in terms of liquidity and, dare-I-say-it, reputation. However, in my opinion we will soon we will see it being replaced as the benchmark as more CERs come to the market. The positon in the market of the other credits, as they become more liquid, will be similar to that of junk bonds.

 

Thats right, the CER will be the 30 year bond of the Carbon world and all others will gague their value against them.

 

o        The ERUs, the retarded sister of the CER, will perhaps trade closer to CERS.

o        The VERs and VCUs will be 'credits in waiting' like the "always the bridesmaid, never the bride".

o        The RGGI credits will be the exclusive toy of the posh New England players and market churners of White Plains, NY (like that Sulfur thing).

o        The California Credits will be owned by Stephen Speilberg and Tom Hanks.

 

About the only real value of an international and basis-risk play market is the amount of specialists employed due to the complicated nature of the various markets. With credits popping up all over the place, there will be plenty of jobs for those soon-to-be unemployed equity traders. 

 

 

.

Bearish Markets and the Carbon Market?


    Right! Here we are folks in the beginning of a healthy correction/bear market. What does it mean for the Carbon Market?

    I want your views. What do you think? What types of influence do you see? List them for me in one-liners and I will publish them in the next weeks.
For example. With the coming lay-offs similar to what followed the 1987 collapse (Yes, i am THAT old) I expect quite a few financial market layoffs.This might bleed into the Carbon market as potential investment money might dry up.  But in this example we can say that there is a major effect and a follow on. Namely, if investment money dries up, another 20 things can be said to be connected. So list them for me in this way:

I expect investment money to dry up and a lot of people will be laid off. (Feel free to use the first segment over and over again, i.e., "I expect investment money to dry up and (therefore) .."

More examples (actually based on my views)

I expect the issue of global warming will move further down the food chain because employment will take higher precedence.

I think that investment into newer technologies will suffer since companies will reduce R&D in favor of shoring up the failing share price.

  Let me have your comments.





Messenger on the move. Text MSN to 63463 now!